Hello world! Over the past few weeks we (Sam and Elias) have been working together on collecting items to contribute to the local Carleton COVID-19 archive. As a small group, we have been able to work closely on developing our ideas about what kinds of themes we’re interested in, what kinds of items represent those themes, and how we want to approach the process of selection, collection, and preservation. We decided early on that we are both very interested in documenting the ways in which community institutions (e.g. libraries, small businesses, and schools, but also families, friend groups, clubs, etc.) are making efforts to continue serving the public, fostering community, and/or stay in business under current (evolving) circumstances. The economic impact of this pandemic is yet to be fully evident, but it is certain to be a point of emphasis in the histories that are written of our present moment. It is important, then, to preserve the digital and analog communications (newsletters, social media updates, etc.), public signage, and personal experiences that highlight and represent the changing face of our local landscapes, both literal and metaphorical. These images, documents, and voices not only shed light on the many implications of current economic conditions but also illuminate the ways in which institutions are continuing to foster community even during times of grave uncertainty regarding both the health of the public and the health of our local institutions themselves.
Be it a “store closed” sign or a newsletter outlining a grocer’s delivery schedule, the sources that we have preserved in the archive up to this point appear as if authored by the institution. While we know that there were people behind these publications, there is minimal indication of internal decision-making and strategizing in these outward-facing publications even if they do convey emotion, anxiety, and a personal touch. We find it very important to preserve these outwardly-facing sources and will continue to do so. Representing how institutions present themselves to the public is certainly a marker of their shifting (or static) public role. Yet going forward, we are also interested in capturing the behind-the-scenes production of these external communiqués. This could be in the form of guided oral histories, written responses, short interviews, among other things. We would like to trace the difference between, internally, how meaning is contested, priorities are debated, and community is conceived and how these messages are conveyed to the public. This endeavor will hopefully answer and preserve questions about the social and emotional forces that alter the leap from personal conceptions of crisis and community to public, institutional sharings thereof.















